Many Christians support, on moral grounds, the prescription drug benefit for the elderly that Congress and the President are about to enact. They believe that Christ's call to help the poor and the needy extends beyond the realm of individual action to the state, and that the government has a moral imperative to provide for the poor. Some more liberal Christian groups, such as the National Council of Churches, seek to use the power of government to "end poverty." They believe that Christ's love can be expressed through government social programs, and that Christians should morally support welfare and entitlement programs that benefit the poor. No matter how well meaning these Christians are, however, they fundamentally misunderstand the nature and purpose of Christian charity. They fail to appreciate that Christ's kingdom is not political or of this world, that good works must stem from faith and love of God, and that an important purpose of charity is a witness to non-believers. Additionally, American anti-poverty programs are based on the un-biblical notion of entitlement. Government programs do not further the kingdom of Christ, and Christians should not mistakenly believe that Jesus' call for individual acts of charity extends to the government. Faith versus Works
It is through faith, not any merit or good work on the part of man, that God provides salvation. By its very nature, faith must be voluntary and freely undertaken, and it must involve true inner transformation, not mere outward works. In Christ's words, "God is spirit, and those who worship Him must worship in spirit and truth" (John 4:24). No man can force another to change their beliefs against their will. True Christians freely and voluntarily believe in Christ, and this faith is the center of their life. The State and Coercion This is one of the reasons why the Kingdom of Christ and worldly governments are separate and distinct. Jesus expressed this distinction in his reply to the Pharisees "Give to Caesar what is Caesar's, and to God what is God's" (Matthew 22:21). While secular government plays a legitimate role in society, nothing in the New Testament remotely suggests that Christ wants his servants to utilize the coercive powers of the state to spread the gospel. John records that the Jews wished to serve Christ as a political Lord, but "Jesus, knowing that they intended to come and make him king by force, withdrew again to a mountain by himself" (John 6:15). Christ also demonstrated that while he had the power to use force, he would not.
Again in the gospel of John, Christ emphasizes the difference between secular authorities and his rule: "Jesus said, 'My kingdom is not of this world. If it were, my servants would fight to prevent my arrest by the Jews. But now my kingdom is from another place'" (John 18:36). The state has a legitimate role in society, but it remains a coercive instrument and separate from Christ's kingdom. Christians should recognize that attempts to utilize the power of the state to achieve Christian ends are inherently contradictory and fly in the face of scripture and the example set by Christ. God tells us to give to those in need, but nothing in scripture suggests extending that mandate to the government, which has nothing of its own to give, but can only redistribute the wealth of its citizens. Government programs that aid the poor, such as welfare, Medicaid, and food stamps, have worthy goals but achieve them using non-Christian means - the coercive power of the state. While God, in His providence, certainly has the power and ability to use the state to achieve his ends, Christians should nonetheless seek to use more direct and scriptural means to help the poor. Love Is the Basis of Christian Charity
Christians do not help the less fortunate in any expectation that it leads to salvation. Rather, Christians are saved by faith, and as a result of faith they help their neighbors. While charity, in and of itself, does not save, Christians will nonetheless love others because of God's love. John expressed it clearly when he wrote "We love because he first loved us" (1 John 4:19). Christian charity results from faith in and love of God and is performed voluntarily. Christians see the depth of God's love towards us, even though we are sinful and fallen individuals, and are moved to freely love and help others. Without faith and love, charity is meaningless to a Christian. While God tells us that good works lay up a treasure in heaven, that is not why Christians help others. Paul writes that "each man should give what he has decided in his heart to give, not reluctantly or under compulsion, for God loves a cheerful giver" (2 Corinthians 9:7) and again "if I give all I possess to the poor and surrender my body to the flames, but have not love, I gain nothing" (1 Corinthians 13:3). Giving to others is a service to God, and should be done cheerfully and in a spirit of love and gratitude for the many gifts God has given us. Involuntary government programs, in contrast, do not fulfill this Christian duty to love and serve others. The vast majority of Americans, including most Christians, do not pay the taxes that fund social programs in a spirit of love towards God, they pay them because if they refuse the government will sentence them to jail. The programs might help the poor, but they have nothing to do with loving your neighbor or serving Christ. The government cannot force its citizens to give out of love, and using the power of government to force others to help the poor is not a Christian act. Whatever their effects, welfare programs remove the Christian motive and moral foundation for helping the poor. Government Charity Decreases Christian Witness
Christ commands his followers to let their "light shine before men, that they may see your good deeds and praise your Father in heaven" (Matthew 5:16). Peter advises believers to "live such good lives among the pagans that, though they accuse you of doing wrong, they may see your good deeds and glorify God on the day he visits us" (1 Peter 2:12). Because of their faith, Christians love and serve their neighbors. Through this love and these acts of kindness they witnesses God's deep love for all people to the world. The world is self-centered and self absorbed, but, through their selfless love for others, Christians demonstrate that life consists of more than pleasing yourself. Christian charity is an important vehicle in preaching God's word. Government programs, however, do nothing to preach the gospel. Welfare recipients do not praise God for their checks, they do not see individuals defying the values of the world. They receive money from the government, which taxes its citizens to pay for the program, whether they want to or not. Government spending, by definition, is divorced from faith and voluntary sacrifice to others, and cannot witness God's love. When government programs supplant private religious charities, they decrease the opportunities available for Christians to preach God's word. The Entitlement Mentality Has No Christian Support Furthermore, the bible explicitly repudiates the notion that Christians have a duty to help the poor under all circumstances. Charity is a gift, not an entitlement, and only the deserving should receive it. Those who can help themselves, but choose not to, should not receive assistance that will only allow them to indulge in their laziness. Paul expresses this clearly when he writes that
Paul clearly states that Christians must work to earn their daily bread, that they should not abuse the generosity of others if they are capable of providing for themselves. Even Paul, who had every right to claim assistance from his fellow believers as he spread God's word, did not. Anyone who is capable of providing for himself ought to do so, and has no "right" to receive charitable aid from others. Bush's prescription drug benefit, for example, will be available to all seniors, regardless of their income or ability to provide for themselves. Any moral justification for providing "entitlement" payments must come from a source outside the bible, for the Christian doctrine of charity is irreconcilable with the notion of an entitlement to aid under all circumstances. Conclusion .
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|||
|
http://www.evangelsociety.org/sherk/charity.html
|
||||