~Second in a series concerning the Christian response to homosexuality
(part one)
Recently the issue of homosexual relationships, in particular,
homosexual relationships and their presence within the church was
brought to national prominence by the decision of the Anglican Episcopal
church to appoint an openly gay priest as bishop. This uncertainty
about the moral standing of homosexuality discloses how the church's
standard of sin is faltering. If we as Christians are not united
around what is good and what is evil, our witness to the unbelieving
world is lost and the Church's position as the source of moral truth
within our culture is gone. In order to have a coherent and consistent
witness to the unbelieving world in the area of homosexuality, the
church needs to continue to condemn homosexuality as a sin. Only
when homosexuality is treated as a sin can a person struggling with
homosexuality rely on the healing grace of God for life changing,
and ultimately soul changing healing.
In my previous article "Walking the Walk: The Christian Response
to Homosexuality," I called for the need to relate to the homosexual
community. We need to reiterate that as Christians we are called
to show love and compassion to unbelievers, which, of course, includes
the homosexual community. This witness is of utmost importance and
cannot be maintained without the church adhering to a consistent
biblical position, which holds that the practice of homosexuality
is sinful. The Anglican Bishop of Virginia, when asked whether he
would have schism or unity (concerning the homosexual disagreement
within the church), replied: "As the church faces the danger
of a schism, maintaining unity and taking measures to hold things
together is vitally important."(1) This attitude
toward the truth in favor of "unity" is deadly. While
unity in the church is important, even a central issue, there cannot
be unity without truth. A further statement from the church declares:
There has been no "schism" in the Anglican Communion
or Episcopal Church, although differences on the issue of homosexuality
are deep and strong, and may yet divide us. Disagreement within
the Communion is common, acceptable, and even desirable, and the
Anglican Communion has experienced and continues to experience
disagreement about other issues, like the ordination of women.
We
remain focused on our beliefs and our mission in the community
and the world. (Ibid)
One must ask how the church can "remain focused on its beliefs
and its mission to the community and the world" if the church
is not steadfast about foundational issues like marriage? If the
church does not stand upon truth, on what does it stand? There can
be no effective witness by standing firmly upon the space between
"disagreements."
Many people, and perhaps this bishop adopt an attitude of tolerance
instead of condemnation because they do not want to alienate homosexuals.
However, if we do not call sin "sin," then we cannot win
people to Christ. Ultimately, our response to homosexual sin is
a gospel issue. As Dr. Paul Zahl, a preeminent Anglican priest opposed
to gay unions, noted, the failure to call homosexuality a sin, "demolishes
salvation because it asserts that what Scripture calls sin is not
sin. When there is no sin, there is no judgment. Without judgment,
there can be no repentance. Without repentance, there is no forgiveness.
The . . . decision . . . thus denies the redemption of the world
to a whole category of persons" (2) When the
church calls homosexuality sin it is not just subjectively criticizing
the "sexual preference" of a certain group of individuals;
instead we are condemning their behavior out of love. In a message
about homosexuality within the Church, Dr. Phillip Ryken emphasized
that the homosexual community must understand that "The only
way to resist temptations and pursue a life of sexual purity is
doing what is right before God, who shows mercy to sinners."
(3) If anyone should know this, it is the church-both its members
and the ministers who are called to lead by the holiness of their
example. We want the homosexual community to understand that it
is ultimately the righteousness of God that the homosexual has offended.
They must see that the quarrel is with God and not us. Only then,
can we lovingly point the way to God through our relationships.
For relationships to succeed and the church to be an effective witness,
the church has to be united in its condemnation of homosexuality.
The failure of the church to take a firm stand upon the issue of
homosexuality and the sanctity of marriage diminishes the power
of the healing grace of the gospel.
In order for an effective witness to be established by Christians
within the homosexual community, the church must first have a consistent
position about the sinfulness of homosexuality. The recent controversy
within the Anglican Church illustrates the current problem within
the church. For an effective witness to condemn sin, provide relationship,
and present the healing power of the gospel, the church must stand
firm in its position that the practice of homosexuality is incompatible
with the scriptures while continuing to foster meaningful relationships
with homosexuals. Only when sin is called sin and truth called truth
can the foundation for true healing be established.
(1) Bishop Peter Lee quoted in Christianity Today
Sept. 16, 2004.
(2) Dr. Paul Zahl. "A Trajectory Away from
the Truth: How to Undermine the Bible," Southern Baptist Theological
Seminary, Louisville, August 13, 2003
(3) Dr. Phillip Ryken The Gay Bishop. window on
the world sept. 7, 2003.
|